Upcoming 5-Star (11/17 release): No 3-Star Version
Comments
-
I liked the purple squiggle better as a placeholder.
0 -
@DAZ0273 said:
Isn't the BP2 Namor more linked to being Native American or Central/South American? He is the ruler of Talokan which comes from Aztec culture. I agree however that the clue fits Forge, Riri or even Shuri better.
I’ve heard that’s the angle they’re taking with Namor, yeah, not sure that a retconned fictional mesoamerican culture says “Native American heritage month” to me when other such characters exist, but nothing is perfect I suppose.
The clue + Wakanda Forever coming out imply Shuri Black Panther to me; if it turns out to be Namor I’d love to know how they got there from that clue.
0 -
Is this 4* a “bonus release,” or an error? Mine shows the name but I won’t say in case it’s a bug.
0 -
I hope it's an error, but with their non-existant updates on the what's new thread it's really hard to say.
1 -
So clue for the next 4*... Mr Pumpkin? *
- not the actual clue... but a guess at the clue following update to R264
0 -
Home grown smarts = Riri
0 -
Like having breakfast for dinner but for holidays 🤘
0 -
And in the night we'll wish this never ends
We'll wish this never ends1 -
@Bowgentle said:
I hope it's an error, but with their non-existant updates on the what's new thread it's really hard to say.It’s gone now so obviously a glitch. It will be fun when people start guessing the character every time until released though.
0 -
@Sekilicious said:
It’s gone now so obviously a glitch. It will be fun when people start guessing the character every time until released though.
I think this character was one of those on the list along with Black Knight & Deathlok that we got to vote for but could be mis-remembering.
0 -
Maybe we should ask Fight if we have to keep tip-toeing around this subject?
@fight4thedream - An unreleased 4* character showed up in peoples non-rostered lists in the game presumably as a mistake/glitch - if forum members refer to this character would it be considered a breach of Forum rules in the circumstances? Thanks.
Edit: OK so I see in another thread that this has sort of been answered and it appears OK as long as we use the spoiler function.
2 -
Yeah that list had a few characters on it, some of them super interesting relative to this game.
0 -
I believe the list was:
Abomination
Black Knight
Blink
Hercules
Dani Moonstar
Night Nurse
DeathlokI might be missing one… I can’t remember if there were 8 (based on re-reading the thread I only see these 7).
If Abomination is correct (and I think it was, but I’m thinking it was simply a glitch for the next 4… and not implying we’ll be getting an extra/bonus 4), then we’ll have 3 of the 7, which possibly gives more support to some of our initial assumptions that all 7 were on the “future/approved” list and will come sooner or later, but we as fans were the ones who pushed Black Knight to the top of the list.
0 -
I as fan definitely voted for Night Nurse lol; I assumed Eternals as then-current Marvel Tentpole got us BK first
0 -
@DAZ0273 said:
Maybe we should ask Fight if we have to keep tip-toeing around this subject?@fight4thedream - An unreleased 4* character showed up in peoples non-rostered lists in the game presumably as a mistake/glitch - if forum members refer to this character would it be considered a breach of Forum rules in the circumstances? Thanks.
Edit: OK so I see in another thread that this has sort of been answered and it appears OK as long as we use the spoiler function.
I appreciate you checking.
In this case, when there is an in-game error revealing a future character or event, we don't treat such information as data-mined information. We do ask that you be considerate and use the spoiler tag function for those that may not have noticed the error but that's just a matter of courtesy so normally we won't issue a warning.
With that said, we do reserve the right to remove content when deemed necessary and if a user goes about it in a rude or obnoxious way that would be grounds for a warning (see rules 7 and 8).
Hope that clears things up! Also, please keep in mind we have a new dev team and new Forum Administrator so there's a possibility the current policy may change.
2 -
[redacted].
This game requires a serious reengineering of the game progresssion. planned times for char turn over, full coverage and absolution times (accounting min-max on acceptable levels for planned sales and pve-pvp placement success etc.). diminishing returns instead of increasing returns as well as planned aging ... and doing all that without losing already over commited-overhyped player base.
Mod note: Removed inappropriate comment. - fight4thedream
-1 -
@Bergen said:
This game requires a serious reengineering of the game progresssion. planned times for char turn over, full coverage and absolution times (accounting min-max on acceptable levels for planned sales and pve-pvp placement success etc.). diminishing returns instead of increasing returns as well as planned aging ... and doing all that without losing already over commited-overhyped player base.
Nah it doesn't need any of that. It's fine
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 45.4K Marvel Puzzle Quest
- 1.6K MPQ News and Announcements
- 20.6K MPQ General Discussion
- 6.4K MPQ Bugs and Technical Issues
- 3K MPQ Tips and Guides
- 2.1K MPQ Character Discussion
- 173 MPQ Supports Discussion
- 2.5K MPQ Events, Tournaments, and Missions
- 2.8K MPQ Alliances
- 6.4K MPQ Suggestions and Feedback
- 13.9K Magic: The Gathering - Puzzle Quest
- 530 MtGPQ News & Announcements
- 5.5K MtGPQ General Discussion
- 99 MtGPQ Tips & Guides
- 443 MtGPQ Deck Strategy & Planeswalker Discussion
- 308 MtGPQ Events
- 60 MtGPQ Coalitions
- 1.2K MtGPQ Suggestions & Feedback
- 5.8K MtGPQ Bugs & Technical Issues
- 548 Other 505 Go Inc. Games
- 21 Puzzle Quest: The Legend Returns
- 5 Adventure Gnome
- 6 Word Designer: Country Home
- 428 Other Games
- 178 General Discussion
- 250 Off Topic
- 7 505 Go Inc. Forum Rules
- 7 Forum Rules and Site Announcements