Balancing Changes 7.6.1

124»

Comments

  • LoboX01
    LoboX01 Posts: 65 Match Maker

    @AnonymousPW123 said:

    @LoboX01 said:

    @AnonymousPW123 said:

    @LoboX01 said:

    @AnonymousPW123 said:

    @AbyssalChicken said:
    I support almost all of these changes, with the only exception being Mystical Teachings. For being a Masterpiece, it absolutely must net you more than +3 mana. 3 mana is what any planeswalker with a neutral mana bonus gets on a 3-swap. Hello? lol

    To echo what Nalthazar said above, I would appreciate seeing changes made, and communicated(!), more frequently. I think you hit almost everything else on the head, more or less. Although, I do still think Grist needs a nerf to her abilities, which you could accomplish in any number of ways; she's just too efficient with milling, reanimation, support removal, token creation, and life drain, (edit: and graveyard removal) all without any cards! Even with Valgavoth available now, I still get stomped with Grist regularly. Otherwise, I again agree with Nalthazar and would like to see the less popular planeswalkers embiggened.

    Too many cry babies about Grist. If you can’t beat grist, that’s a skill issue. Get better. I have zero issues, ever. That’s the puzzle part, learn to play. Everyone keeps screaming nerfs and now look what happens. The game becomes 20x worse just because you crybabies aren’t good at the game.

    Yes, some things needs adjusting and you guys got your wishes. The nerf wave. Now you aren’t satisfied because it didn’t go your exact way?! What did you expect from this company? Seriously.

    You f2p players expect to be on par with people who spend money and allow you to have a game still. Of course you won’t be on par with them in terms of cards but that doesn’t make it impossible. This update was the most **** thing I’ve seen a game do. That’s why I have cancelled my VIP going forward.

    If I spend time and money on these cards because of how they WERE and then they can just be changed to unplayable in a blink of an eye, why should I spend anymore? Oh yeah, I won’t. Especially coming from a **** company like Webcore that has no communication skills or anything.

    2 days later and not a single PR attempt. That’s how sh*tty they are.

    Funny how these nerfs can always turn into a FTP vs PTW battle, because some (not all, please keep in mind) self-entitled d... head comes here and start to put the blame on the FTP "crybabies".

    Well guess what, these changes also impact and hurt those crybabies decks, because they might have spent significant amount of time, and in game resource to get those cards you paid for an early access, so that's that. I don't think they asked for all these changes.

    Second, do we really think that WC would make the change just because the crybabies ask for it? If you believe that than you are ...er than i think ( you can put in any words in there you would like).

    You are unhappy with the changes because you spent money and time, go ahead voice your opinion to the devs. Put blame on another player group, and call them out saying "get better" well that is a different story.

    But using your own words: Get better with your spending decisions my man. The moment you spend money on ANY mobile game, you put it into a black hole. The game can go away, devs can make changes etc. Learn to spend LOL

    You stopped spending, heck you might even quit, I am sure a lot of crybabies will cry over the night for you and your glorious present in the game.

    Ah, yes, you just proved my point. Truth hurts. Get over it

    What truth? that you are a d ... head, nothing to prove there, you did it already lol.

    You were the crybaby there, because you were crying over your spending, so again nothing to prove there.

    Other than that nothing there to see. I am dealing with a holes all the time you are not the first and not the last one lol

    So what did YOU prove? show me your proof that the devs made the changes because of the crybabies. please go ahead and show it

    you came here insulted a whole bunch of players, and proved nothing, so .... duh

    you said it truth hurts, you are self entitled little prick who is crying because someone took away his toy. other than that i proved no points haha but please keep going

    You took it personally… must be some truth there. Enjoy, Sally.

    Crybaby part is spot on also! Look at what it drags out from the deep…

    See that is the funny part? The only ONE card i complained was Ocelot, and for a good reason and i know that for sure, because most of the community agreed that it needed a nerf.

    So no, you missed big time there.

    So where is your crybaby spot on? I really enjoy these conversations, when i talk to a dum...ss who can not prove a single point of his LOL

    In my alliance community, we have a tons of teams and players, including big spenders, smaller spenders, and ftp "crybabies". And i feel sympathy for the spenders, cause they spent money on something, now it changed they are pissed. Not a SINGLE ONE of them put the blame on FTPs, not one... does this tell you something? i guess not, cause you need brain to understand and not money, money can't help with that. FTPs are complaining too about cards they chased, and now garbage or barely usable.

    Oh and another miss there, I spent money on that game, not at a whale level mind you, not lately anyways, few years ago, probably a little whale level. So again you are very wrong.

    I had no problem with anyone here blaming the devs, but a little prick? lol different thing i really enjoy that part, conversing people who think money can buy brain too. so please by all means keep talking about you non-existent proofs and spot on things i am curios what's next that is "spot on"

  • McLaren720S
    McLaren720S Posts: 17 Just Dropped In

    Adjusting card strength in this way is possible, but some game objectives must be modified to match the difficulty level of the cards. For example, certain battles that limit defeating the opponent to 5 turns.

  • Tolkne
    Tolkne Posts: 47 Just Dropped In

    Since they decided to nerf such cards,

    Then please remove the 5-turn requirement for this specific event!
    Beginners won't get through with such a 5-turn requirement, it's not just a matter of luck! I tried it myself, but it doesn't depend on the deck, it depends on LUCK.
    The thing is, I barely managed to get a bunch of minions together with Grist - Ghalta and a Double Attack creature to quickly finish off the boss and complete the trick to win the fight in 5 turns.
    There's no other way! Because not all beginners have such cards.

    That's why they brazenly removed the advantage from MT for GW (Golden Wish). Without MT, there's no way! Because it's the most key and effective card. Turning a Masterpiece into a Mythic or worse is a sign of progress, that you're not developing the game, but rather killing it. The time will come when you'll understand why players leave immediately, because of this.

    Even during EoE, THEY NEVER REWORKED THE STATION FUNCTION! I don't even know how to get a level 9 Station, and it has to be swapped with loyalty every time... and it's incredibly inefficient, and look at the stats. Not a single player plays the Station card, and they won't even play it for 10 years!
    Many people asked to reconsider the possibility of changing the mechanics like Station and Descend (yes, from the Ixalan era). No one made it easier to level up Station and Descend. Instead, they simply killed the MT card, Titan Vanguard, and Desert.
    A really cool strategy with a rebalance! Someday there will be boosters like these, where there will be a feature like Station, but NO ONE will play with cards like these! It's a waste of time and unnecessary garbage that will never be used for many years.

  • TIMEWARP
    TIMEWARP Posts: 115 Tile Toppler

    I feel that the nerfs fail to look at why players play PQ.
    As a veteran since the start, but always FtP, my reason for playing is top performance in the weekend team events. The weekday events are just there to convert resources: "my time" converted into "best cards". I don't care about Planar Chaos, Streets of Ravnica, etc from a game perspective, they are there to gather resources and to do that in the most efficient way. The less time I have to spend during the week, whilst still gathering resources,the better. That is fun for me.
    With these nerfs the playtime has gone up dramatically
    The ideal card for me would be "1 mana, you win this game, you can only cast this in non-coalition PvE matches"
    Mystical Teaching came somewhat close to that card, but with the 'downside' that you could use it anywhere and therefore mess with the experience of other players.

    My point: D3/Webcore needs to address options to make the game rewarding for FtP players whose only resource to invest is time, and ensure that if these players do invest time, they get rewarded by having to spend less of it.

  • TheDude1
    TheDude1 Posts: 240 Tile Toppler

    @TIMEWARP said:
    I feel that the nerfs fail to look at why players play PQ.
    As a veteran since the start, but always FtP, my reason for playing is top performance in the weekend team events. The weekday events are just there to convert resources: "my time" converted into "best cards"
    ....
    My point: D3/Webcore needs to address options to make the game rewarding for FtP players whose only resource to invest is time, and ensure that if these players do invest time, they get rewarded by having to spend less of it.

    I'm disagreeing with you here. F2P are valuable/important to the game ecosystem, but I do not believe they should be the main target of Webcore's priorities compared to other global issues. And it's weird to say that the only resource you can offer is time, but that the devs should put in work so that you give less of it while they get literally nothing else? And as a veteran F2P I'd argue that my playtime with these nerfs functionally hasn't changed.

    To your point about being efficient on time in this game, it's weird that you're skipping Planar Chaos - for time investment purporses, it's a 5-match event that gives better rewards (most recent pack, guaranteed rare, 15 pink and net 20 gold) than most any other event available. I can get through most matches with a Pajani deck (and none of the nerfed cards) in 4-7 rounds. Nerfing MT and others has so far had minimal impact on my time investment, though I'm judicious in the other weekday events I play.

    IMO (and this is probably where I lose most people here), weekend coalition events are the time trap. I almost never play coalition events because my weekend time is more valuable than the rewards I would get. Individual progression is 6-8 perfect matches to get 3 packs, 40 gold and 5 crystals. That's not nothing, but it's not an amazing return on time either. Individual rank requires going perfect in even more matches, but reward is just packs and another 5 crystals. And given the rotation of events, most packs are from older sets and are just dupes at this point.

    I played the most recent coalition event because it gave SHM packs, which I still have a need for. My "coalition" is just me, and I finished in the top 250. If I were to join a top-25, the difference is one pack (dupes), runes (don't need), 45 gold and 35 pink - not even three full days of Planar Chaos. That difference is essentially saying that for 3 months worth of work on the weekends, I can get one extra premium pack and **one ** Mythic+ card. That to me is a grind, and I'd rather do other things with my weekend.

    (Side note, it's alarming that a one-player "coalition" can crack the top 250 over the weekend. Even if every other coalition ahead of me was fully stocked with 20 players - and they're not - that's less than 5,000 total active players on the weekend, plus maybe another few hundred behind me in the standings.)

    TLDR: I don't begrudge your approach, even if mine is different. But I'm not following the idea that F2P and being a high-end collector in this game should be compatible, or that the goal of using time as your exclusive resource should be to spend less time.

  • Anarchangel
    Anarchangel Posts: 64 Match Maker

    Nerfing the cards isn't the best answer.
    When players who don't have and aren't likely to acquire the nerfed cards are playing each other, they have no reason to want the cards nerfed.
    The answer is a better system of player matching.

    I guess there are cards that are annoying to play against, and that's also a separate issue.
    Namely, the animation (still) needs fixing.

  • TIMEWARP
    TIMEWARP Posts: 115 Tile Toppler

    @TheDude1 said:

    @TIMEWARP said:
    I feel that the nerfs fail to look at why players play PQ.
    As a veteran since the start, but always FtP, my reason for playing is top performance in the weekend team events. The weekday events are just there to convert resources: "my time" converted into "best cards"
    ....
    My point: D3/Webcore needs to address options to make the game rewarding for FtP players whose only resource to invest is time, and ensure that if these players do invest time, they get rewarded by having to spend less of it.

    I'm disagreeing with you here. F2P are valuable/important to the game ecosystem, but I do not believe they should be the main target of Webcore's priorities compared to other global issues. And it's weird to say that the only resource you can offer is time, but that the devs should put in work so that you give less of it while they get literally nothing else? And as a veteran F2P I'd argue that my playtime with these nerfs functionally hasn't changed.

    To your point about being efficient on time in this game, it's weird that you're skipping Planar Chaos - for time investment purporses, it's a 5-match event that gives better rewards (most recent pack, guaranteed rare, 15 pink and net 20 gold) than most any other event available. I can get through most matches with a Pajani deck (and none of the nerfed cards) in 4-7 rounds. Nerfing MT and others has so far had minimal impact on my time investment, though I'm judicious in the other weekday events I play.

    IMO (and this is probably where I lose most people here), weekend coalition events are the time trap. I almost never play coalition events because my weekend time is more valuable than the rewards I would get. Individual progression is 6-8 perfect matches to get 3 packs, 40 gold and 5 crystals. That's not nothing, but it's not an amazing return on time either. Individual rank requires going perfect in even more matches, but reward is just packs and another 5 crystals. And given the rotation of events, most packs are from older sets and are just dupes at this point.

    I played the most recent coalition event because it gave SHM packs, which I still have a need for. My "coalition" is just me, and I finished in the top 250. If I were to join a top-25, the difference is one pack (dupes), runes (don't need), 45 gold and 35 pink - not even three full days of Planar Chaos. That difference is essentially saying that for 3 months worth of work on the weekends, I can get one extra premium pack and **one ** Mythic+ card. That to me is a grind, and I'd rather do other things with my weekend.

    (Side note, it's alarming that a one-player "coalition" can crack the top 250 over the weekend. Even if every other coalition ahead of me was fully stocked with 20 players - and they're not - that's less than 5,000 total active players on the weekend, plus maybe another few hundred behind me in the standings.)

    TLDR: I don't begrudge your approach, even if mine is different. But I'm not following the idea that F2P and being a high-end collector in this game should be compatible, or that the goal of using time as your exclusive resource should be to spend less time.

    My friend, I play (nearly) everything, every day. I feel that that had lead to a fine way as a FtP player of 9 years to get a reasonably full collection: as it should be in my opinion. FtP should be the basis to get everything if you dedicate enough time, if you want shortcuts pay irl cash.

  • Enigma
    Enigma Posts: 55 Match Maker
    edited 14 December 2025, 18:13

    So far, seems like the balancing is ok. Much less stress when Greg's Rakdos or Aegis Assimilation hit the screen. I don't own Mystical Teachings, so I don't feel the loss that many in here do, and I've still gotten wrecked by it a few times... The Cryptex adjustment is the one that hurts most, for me. It helped achieve the 12 mana or less objectives, which was nice, and now it's pretty much junk. The Titan fix also hurts, one of my favorite decks relied pretty heavily on it and, as noted, the adjustment has made the 5 rounds or less objectives more challenging (Moonlight Cavalry is probably going to be my go-to now for those, but I imagine it's probably one of the next cards to face "rebalancing", unfortunately).

    imo despite the rebalancing there will ALWAYS be P2P players (and some F2P players also, of course) that fill their decks with 9 or 10 mythic masterpieces that stomp if you're not fast enough or if you don't build with the right removal. My suggestion is take the opportunity to explore some different cards and Planeswalkers and find other broken combos. Maybe take a break from the game for a while, I did and it made the game fresh upon returning, though I did miss out on some good cards in the sets that were released during that time.

    A lot of good things said in this thread regarding the need for reworking cards and mechanics, for better and for worse. Some really rude and entitled folks too... but that's not surprising at all. It is fair that those who invest $ and tons of time feel slighted though, for sure.

    Anyway, how are others feeling about things now that you've had some gameplay after the reworking?

  • FCLedZep
    FCLedZep Posts: 68 Match Maker

    When I was a new player I was excited to see my opponent defeating me with a combo deck. I had something to chase and try myself. I also had to find something to prevent the combo and chase those cards too.

    The power level of the game already was pretty low but after the whining (I really don’t understand why people are complaining about the power level while most people win 99% of the games) and the poorly executed nerving the game is a pale imitation of itself.

    My interest for the game has dwindled severely the last few months. I played almost every event but since Lorwyn there are no cards to chase so I only played events for Mana Jewels which I can’t spend because there’s nothing left to chase.

    I can’t stand anymore how long it takes to fix bugs. The lack of communication is embarrassing. I did buy Kaalia of the Vast but after the nerving of Mystical Teachings it’s pretty useless. The games are much slower and feel like a drag.

    If this dull nerving ain’t reversed fast I probably quit!

  • Keyler
    Keyler Posts: 123 Tile Toppler
    edited 15 December 2025, 16:56

    Experience after the nerf:

    • A feeling of speed and dynamism in the games. Now you have to dedicate more time daily to "farming" the small resources generated by each event. The games feel much more interesting having to wait extra turns after using Mystical Teachings and maybe on the next turn cast a good spell fetched with it. (If you're lucky, because as always it still fails when choosing two and often only lets you choose one). Please continue not fixing the cards that don't work. If you see someone complaining about something like this, just remove that card from the game; don't bother trying to make things work and even less so, test the skills. At the end of the month, the salary is the same, and in this way you work less. It´s a Win Win.

    • Now I can finally buy 3 or 4 masterpiece cards that used to cost 20 and now only cost 16 to cast, which practically makes them incredibly overpowered due to their negligible effects in the game. A very good use of the time and effort to improve the game and not to rework the Station ability into something even remotely decent or fixing lot of cards are working bad or remove this popups that appear in the board sometimes when you are drawing cards that you will know if would play the game at least one time (what crazy ideas I have sometimes!!).

    • It's much safer to play support cards now after the nerf that practically makes Requisition Raid unplayable, and I don't have to worry about being hit with a Fiery Annihilation because it costs 20. I hope they don't decide to lower its cost to 10 one day; it would be strange to nerf Requisition Raid and give it similar power for half the cost.

    • Tempt with Discovery, being a masterpiece card, seems like a good deal to convert 12 for an absurd amount of mana, paying 25 for a random board impact that often means the opponent will get a free 5-green conversion on their turn. Good job with this card. Now Golden Wish will finally be playable, because the difference in power between the two spells was abysmal; I understand the nerf to the green card and not the white one.

    • Titan's Vanguard and other cards that allowed for quick wins by adding incremental power to creatures also seem perfect to me. We need to make games last longer, no matter what. Leaving it at a cost of 22, which currently makes it unplayable, is also a very good adjustment.

    • Lowering Temp with Discovery's power level also eliminates the worry of an opponent with Grist entering into play a free Ghalta with his first ability and throwing their entire hand at your face. And with Mystical Teachings nerfed, it's even harder to respond to such a play.

    • I could continue thanking the developers for their dedication to this game, especially by designing a bunch of extremely overpowered cards and a lot of very bored and useless other ones, making the metagame repetitive and with none diversity. I hope for more abilities like Station for example; after the nerf, I'll play it even more. I hope they continue to avoid opening the game just to play a few matches and understand what this game they're programming is all about.

    • Finally, the Aegis, which we barely complained about when it was released because it was perfectly balanced and was not a problem to play against, resulting in very dynamic, fair and fun matches, has been fixed after almost two years. Good work on the speed with which they addressed player feedback. Good balancing, too, making it unplayable with one shield instead of making it useful but not broken or frustrating to play against. Something similar happened with Rakdos, but in this case I think now is good balanced (this last is not irony).

    And thanks to the great communication with the developers, I'm now really eager to get all the poorly designed cards with no synergy between them from the last year. With the surprising nerfs, I now want to spend all my resources on getting cards that might become digital paperweights next week. The uncertainty of whether my effort in acquiring resources only to throw them away is what motivates me to keep playing.

    I wish the developers continue in this collaborative approach and attention to players. We really love being heard and receiving quick responses on the forum, and especially when they share their ideas for the coming months so we can get a sense of what they're working on (all the promises they made over two years ago and are fulfilling point by point). We also appreciate to share with us any plans to remove cards that we might be investing a lot of resources in acquiring.
    Having all these new events is also fantastic and makes the game feel very different from two years ago, creativity and innovation in this game make it a fresh experience. I love replaying those Duel Deck events (Chandra vs. Jace, etc.) that, for some reason, only appeared once and couldn't be played with the opposing faction. And the story mode is finally a breath of fresh air, allowing us to play cards against a wall without even looking at what our opponent is playing.

    And to ALL the PLAYERS, my BEST WISHES for the coming year and wishing everyone A MERRY CHRISTMAS and a HAPPY NEW YEAR fully of HEALTH, which is the most important thing of everything I said in this post.

  • Scottyp_123
    Scottyp_123 Posts: 87 Match Maker

    I use Titan' Vanguard in my favorite deck, but I always thought that it was broken and way overpowered; and I can't believe for a second that the developers didn't see it too. To hear them talk about trying to make the cards closer to the paper cards becomes laughable. Look at what they had and how they have changed it:

    "Titans' Vanguard: "One of the other patterns we are starting to keep track of is exponentiable variables. Titans' Vanguard has this issue: his constant power-doubling trigger makes him a one-shot Eldrazi very quickly. We still want to see the power accumulating; just not that fast."

    Before: Creatures you control get +X/+X. X is this creature's power.
After: Creatures you control get +5/+5."

    If they actually wanted it to be more like the paper card it would be closer to:

    When this creature enters the battlefield and whenever this creature attacks, colorless creatures you control get +1/+1.

    That would also make it more inline with a rare card.

  • Scottyp_123
    Scottyp_123 Posts: 87 Match Maker

    I've never spent a penny on this game, but I can have sympathy for those that have. This is not StarCraft where changing the power of units to play around with the meta makes sense and adds continued interest to the game. You don't have to buy units in StarCraft to play them like say the Warhammer 40K TTG. Even as a free to play gamer it's frustrating. To spend tens of thousands of orbs to get that card you want just to have the card nerfed feels pretty bad.

    Just balance the cards properly in the first place, and if you fail that make adjustments quickly. Don't change the cards to play with the meta.

  • Machine
    Machine Posts: 954 Critical Contributor
    edited 16 December 2025 11:42

    @Magic:PQ Support Team in response to these balancing changes, a dire request to spend your developer resources more wisely. We need a stable game, a game we can trust will always work as expected.

    During the last coalition event (Return of the God-Pharaoh), one of our players experienced a spontaneous app restart while playing a match on the third node, causing him (and thus the entire team) to lose 60 points. This resulted in the entire team losing out on the top 2 rewards (the PMA2 pack as the most wanted reward), as we ended in third place very close to the top 2. Said player was demotivated by this in such a way, that he quit the game. I've been in his spot a few times and know how terrible this feels. For many of us T10 players, ranking is often more important than anything else. We need a stable game for that or all effort will be in vain, making us wonder why we are playing this particular game in the first place.

    I've posted similar messages in the past when there were other developers navigating this broken vessel, but it seems you are also not able to fix our beloved ship. I urge you to do your best in giving us a stable game. For some of us, competition is a driving factor, and there is no fair competition if teams, no matter which team, lose due to factors outside of their influence.

Categories